| Element |
Traditional BBS |
Packaged Programs |
Lean BBS |
| |
| Checklist |
• Custom developed by employee team |
• Not customized - Generic checklist based on
industry averages |
• Customized for each site |
| Data Handling (Software) |
• Two companies offer database software, others
have spreadsheets or manual systems |
• Some basic data handling systems •
Some do not gather data
|
• Sophisticated software • Data handling
services available |
| Problem Solving |
• By employee team |
• Not always done |
• Targeted by most appropriate group within the
organization |
| Reinforcement |
• Peer observations |
• Not consistently given |
• Entire organization involved through various
methods |
| Leadership |
• Trained employee teams • Site managers
and supervisors often omitted
|
• Often lacking at the site level •
Sometimes by safety professionals
|
• Trained site facilitator reinforced by site
managers and supervisors |
| Union Resistance |
• Strong, many unions opposed to perceived transfer
of responsibility for safety and peer observations |
• Usually minimal to these products |
• Reasons for union resistance removed |
| Disruption to Normal Operations |
Initial training (work-hrs) 480 - 652
Process maintenance (hrs/mo) 46 - 120
Workers taken off the job 6 - 16
|
120 - 180
20 - 104
6 - 12
|
82 - 94
24 - 64
2 - 6
|
| Cost per site |
High
|
Moderate |
Moderate |
| Results |
• 90% have statistically significant reductions
in accidents • Reductions range from 15-75%
|
• No published results other than a few case studies
for individual locations |
• 100% have had statistically significant reductions
in accidents • Reductions range from 39-89% |
| Benefits |
• Significant accident reductions but at high
direct and indirect costs • Better personal responsibility and
participation in safety
|
• Moderate to no accident reductions •
Cost savings over BBS • Fewer internal resources required
|
• Superior results to BBS • More efficient
use of site resources • Less disruption to normal operations
|